Each
short story in ‘Tales of the Unexpected’ is seemingly bizarre and may appear to
have no relationship between each other. However, under the grotesque and
strange storyline of each different story, there lie repulsive aspects of human
nature. In fact, though the stories of ‘Lamb to the Slaughter’, ‘Skin’, and ‘Man
From the South’ are three separate stories, they share the subject which they
portray: a monster that lurks within human mind, ready to manipulate fragile
human heart whenever it attempts to satiate its evil greed. This ‘monster’ can
be both interpreted as obsession and duplicity of human heart, which are parts
of human nature that Roald Dahl attempted to explore in ‘Tales of the
Unexpected.’
Individual’s
tendency to obsess with certain value or subject is one of human nature that
Roald Dahl illustrated in ‘Tales of the Unexpected.’ Why did Mary Maloney kill
her own husband with a leg of lamb in the story ‘Lamb to the Slaughter’? It is
because of her obsession to seize her husband. Mary Maloney’s obsession towards
her husband is implied when she killed her husband when he said “Don’t make
supper for me. I’m going out.” This phrase indicates that her husband’s
affection towards her was slipping away from Mary’s grip. Therefore, Mary, who
was desperate to retrieve her husband’s love and attention, decided to kill her
husband instead of letting him escape from her life, since her obsession with her
husband was so intense and incontrollable. Why did the woman of Carlos in the
story ‘Man From the South’ have only one finger on her hand and a thumb? It is
because her strong obsession with materialistic values was strong enough to
overwhelm her fear of losing most of her fingers. Why did the stranger trick
Drioli in the story ‘Skin’ to peel the tattoo off Drioli’s back? It is because
of the stranger’s inordinate obsession with aesthetic value that made him
neglect moral concerns. In other words, seemingly absurd and immoral decisions
of the characters in each story imply individuals’ nature to succumb to their
own desire and obsession.
Duplicity
of human mind is another aspect of human nature that is portrayed in ‘Tales of
the Unexpected.’ One of the common aspects of ‘Lamb to the Slaughter’, ‘Skin’,
and ‘Man from the South’ is that these stories have characters who behave in
the manner that belies their intentions. For instance, cheerful and courteous manners
that Mary Maloney showed in front of Sam at a grocery shop or detectives investigating
a murder scene were all feigned behaviors intentioned to hide her guilt and
evidence of murder. Carlos’s woman in ‘Man From the South’ displayed duplicity when
she forcefully stopped Carlos from further engaging in his unusual bet, since
she was actually the one who most eagerly participated in Carlos’s bizarre bet to
win his assets from him. The stranger in ‘Skin’ that faked Drioli to attain the
tattoo on his back is another flagrant example of human’s ability to belie his
or her real intentions. Alluring suggestions that the stranger made to Drioli
superficially seem to be a persuasion to induce win-win situation for both
Drioli and stranger, but those were actually critical death traps that the
stranger had set to garner only his own profits. By portraying characters with
extreme duplicity and excellent skills in concealing their true intentions,
Roald Dahl managed to emphasize untrustworthiness of human nature.
Roald
Dahl successfully reveals the ‘monster’ hidden inside human mind to the surface
by blending obsessive and duplicitous human nature with interesting story
lines. Roald Dahl is commendable for his brilliant talents in humorously and
interestingly combining rather dark and grave subjects pertaining to human
nature with unique story lines. With his prominent talents, Roald Dahl made ‘Tales
of the Unexpected’ into a book that is more effective than a series of didactic
words and complicated philosophical teachings in inducing readers to contemplate
about human nature.
Good work. You cover the stories well and connect the appropriate dots. I see a bit of the Wilde paragraph in your opening paragraph. Was that intentional?
답글삭제I might argue that your statement about the stories appearing "to have no relationship between each other" is a stretch. Clearly, the stories follow similar structures and focus on similar themes, and some critics feel the book features this tendency too heavily (to the point where the twists at the end are predictable). I like your observations about Mary and her intense obsession with her husband, and how she wants to "keep him." But is she really that crazy and in love? I think she probably repressed her real feelings, which came out truly when it became clear that he was going to ruin her life (a life she fought hard to idealize - by pampering her husband like all housewives in the 50's were expected to). I think she's a sympathetic protagonist to some extent, and most readers want her to get away with murder (which she cleverly does).
All in all, the writing is good here, but not your best. Pay attention to your use of quotes:
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/577/03/